Liquid Alternatives: Watch Out For These “Potholes” (Goldman Sachs)
An incisive note from Goldman Sachs Asset Management details the three pitfalls in daily liquid alts investing.
Theodore Enders, Global Head of Goldman Sachs Asset Management (GSAM) Strategic Advisory Solutions, says that investors are sometimes disillusioned with their investments in alternatives. However, on closer analysis, it turns out that poor implementation choices within portfolios are more often the problem rather than flawed strategies. (GSAM)
GSAM used the equity market drawdown triggered by the coronavirus endemic in early 2020 as a case study.
Three common implementation pitfalls
· Defining the term “alternative”
GSAM defines daily liquid alternatives (DLAs) more rigidly compared with Morningstar. In the opinion of GSAM, DLAs are similar to hedge funds because they reduce portfolio risk, better manage equity drawdowns, and provide differentiated returns from both equities and fixed-income. Several funds considered as alternatives by Morningstar do not fall within the ambit of this definition.
“During the Coronacrisis drawdown, the Morningstar funds that we exclude from our stricter definition exhibited sharp performance disparity—with nearly a quarter having deeper drawdowns than the S&P 500 (-34%),” writes Enders. “Investors owning these funds and expecting better performance were likely dismayed by the outcome.”
· Lacking strategy diversification
Investors tend to crowd into the equity long/short strategy. However, there are other DLA strategies available such as tactical trading, relative value, and event-driven.
The problem with excessive use of the equity long/short strategy is that these funds also have the highest beta to equities.
“Therefore, they may disappoint exactly when investors hope to realize the benefits of alternatives,” says Enders. “During the Coronacrisis drawdown, the median Equity Long/Short fund fell -22%, double that of all other alternative funds.”
GSAM recommends the use of a multi-strategy approach.
· Excessive manager concentration
The third pitfall identified by GSAM is the use by investors of only one or two managers. GSM points out that though the median DLA outperformed US large blend funds during the corona crisis, the range of outcomes was nearly 3 times as wide. This shows the greater potential of return dispersion across managers.
“If an alternatives sleeve was comprised of only one or two managers, investors were likely frustrated if those managers were at the bottom end of that range.”
GSAM’s recommendation: Use multi-manager strategies or hedge fund replication strategies.
Related Story: Retail Investors Can Use Alternative ETFs To Their Advantage
Latest Alternative Investment News
Meta (formerly Facebook) (NASDAQ: META) announced on Wednesday the launch of CICERO, the first artificial intelligence (AI) agent to achieve human-level performance in the popular strategy game Diplomacy. So far,…
Astera Labs announced a $150 million Series D funding round led by Fidelity Management and Research that valued the company at $3.15 billion. Other existing investors, including Atreides Management, Intel…
Indeed, according to a CNN article, travellers should get prepared for the most expensive holiday travel season ever. Average air fare is up about 40% from 2021, and rates for…
Digital Assets: Crypto Contagion Spreads To Miners – Iris Energy Unplugs Mining Hardware Amidst Default
Iris Energy (NASDAQ: IREN), the Australia-based bitcoin mining firm, said in a filing that it had taken down a large chunk of its mining capacity that had been used as…