Artificial Intelligence : “We Must Not Allow AI To Determine The Outcome Of A Case” – Chief Justice Of India

Machines cannot replace human decision-making in a judicial system.

Hon’ble the Chief Justice of India, Mr. Justice Sharad Arvind Bobde, says that while AI can provide assistance and information for the evaluation of the merits of a case, it cannot replace the element of human decision-making in a judicial system. (Bar and Bench)

CJI Bobde was speaking at the launch of the report on “Responsible AI for the Indian Justice System” compiled by the Vidhi Centre of Law and Policy along with TCG Crest.

AI’s role limited to delivering information and assistance

According to CJI Bobde (pictured above), the role of AI in the judiciary should be restricted to the extraction and presentation of information at speed. However, the technology cannot substitute the reasoning and emotions that are essential components of a rational judicial decision.

“How to extract information, is where AI in the judiciary must end according to me. Finding out the latest position in law according to me is an important tool. We must not allow AI to determine the outcome of a case,” he said.

CJI opposed to automated decision-making

“I have persistently opposed automated decision making. It is not possible for a system of justice to accept a machine however intelligent to replace a human decision,” the CJI observed.

“There is a lot of emotional basis to a (judicial) decision, which AI cannot reach. Hence I have opposed algorithmic reasons for decisions in court,” he added.

CJI Bobde said that in the current decade the Indian judiciary will take recourse to technology and deploy AI to enhance its capability to deliver justice.

However, he made clear that AI must rest on a bedrock of ethical principles and align with the constitutional rights of citizens.

“We will also not allow it to tell us what to decide when to decide. We will only use it to provide all the information at a high speed,” CJI Bobde stated.

“Where we rely upon judicial technology to aid a judicial decision, it must be subject to the final consideration of a human (mind),” he said.

Related Story:   By 2070, Robotic Judges Will Analyze Body Language To Pin Guilt

Free Industry News

Subscribe to our free newsletter for updates and news about alternatives investments.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.


Latest Alternative Investment News
Venture Capital: Making VC More Inclusive – Google To Invest $40M In Black-Led Startups

Jeremiah Gordon is General Counsel at CapitalG, Alphabet’s (NASDAQ: GOOGL) independent growth fund which has $3 billion under management. He also leads an Alphabet-wide team focused on investing in Black-led…
Digital Assets: Colonial Pipeline Caved; Paid $5M Ransom To Hackers
May 14, 2021     Digital Assets, News

Though initial reports said that Colonial Pipeline would not pay a ransom to the hackers that brought the nation’s largest fuel pipeline to a halt, Bloomberg reported Thursday that the…
Artificial Intelligence: A Molecule For Alzheimer’s Created By Exscientia’s AI Enters Clinical Trials

Oxford, UK-based Exscientia uses AI to design and create drug candidate molecules satisfying complex therapeutic requirements with revolutionary efficiency. Joint research by Exscientia with Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co., Ltd. (TYO:…
Venture Capital: Vinted, The Marketplace For Previously Owned Clothing, Raises $303M
May 13, 2021     News, Venture Capital

Vinted, a European startup that runs a marketplace for used clothing and home goods, announced its raise of $303 million at a valuation of $4.5 billion, post-money. That valuation is…