Artificial Intelligence: Why An Artificial Super Intelligence (ASI) Could Destroy Mankind

It might well be through accident, says Émile P. Torres, a philosopher and historian of global catastrophic risk.

We’ve been pretty wrong about some historic events that eventually did come to pass. Example: The great physicist Ernest Rutherford had famously proclaimed in 1933 that anyone who propounded atomic power was “talking moonshine.” As recently as 1977, a computer industry pioneer supposedly said computers would not reach our homes.

Yet those computers are here and in fact everywhere in various forms and power configurations. In fact, Torres is now worried about the “ever-growing computing power” that is touted as a boon for humanity.

Could these rapidly evolving computers and advances in AI technology create an Artficial Superintelligence (ASI) that could then turn upon us – it’s creator?

According to Torres, the day is not far away when computers could develop a “general intelligence,” not just capabilities restricted to defined tasks. (Washington Post)

“Imagine a single algorithm that could beat a chess grandmaster but also write a novel, compose a catchy melody and drive a car through city traffic,” warns Torres.

In fact, general intelligence is the bridge to superintelligence, and there are, at last count by the Global Catastrophic Risk Institute, 72 projects at this moment working on creating an artificial general intelligence.

According to Torres, an ASI could far exceed the best abilities of human beings. On a positive note, an ASI could make huge strides for our benefit, such as find a cure for cancer or Alzheimer’s.

But an ASI might well work against us, says Torres. However, if an ASI wipes us out, that would be through an accident – because no research organization would willingly create such a malevolent intelligence.

Torres warns that ASI’s are “perhaps the most unpredictable thing in our future,” because their “cognitive architectures may be fundamentally different than ours.”

Torres argues that their risks are unacceptably great.

“With all our global instability and still-nascent grasp on tech, adding in ASI would be lighting a match next to a fireworks factory,” he comments.

Torres suggests that AI research should be slowed, even paused, if necessary by governmental action.

Related Story: Xiaomi Unveils A 177 Cm Tall Humanoid Robot That Can Walk Holding 1.5 Kg In One Hand

Free Industry News

Subscribe to our free newsletter for updates and news about alternatives investments.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.


Latest Alternative Investment News
Alternative Investments/ESG: Six New Responsible Funds Flag Off Morgan Stanley’s ETF Platform

Morgan Stanley Investment Management (MSIM) has launched its ETF platform with six Calvert ETFs listed on NYSE Arca. The ETFs feature Calvert’s responsible investing approach and offer access to four…
Artificial Intelligence: MusicLM, A New Generative AI Tool From Google, Creates Music From Text
February 2, 2023     Artificial Intelligence, News

Google (NASDAQ: GOOGL) recently published a research paper on its new AI tool, MusicLM, designed to create music. The tool is based on machine learning and is trained on vast…
Artificial Intelligence: Snap Mulling AR Glasses Powered By Generative AI
February 2, 2023     Artificial Intelligence, News

Snap (NYSE: SNAP), the parent company of Snapchat, has hinted at future AR glasses powered by generative AI technology. CEO Evan Spiegel stated that AI will be critical to the…
Digital Assets: Binance And Mastercard Launch Prepaid Crypto Card In Brazil
February 1, 2023     Digital Assets, News

Binance and Mastercard (NYSE: MA) have jointly launched the Binance Card in Brazil, allowing Binance users in the country to make purchases and pay bills with cryptocurrencies like bitcoin and…